Saviano's last words had not digested their own.
did to chase away any thoughts, They came back stronger than before.
Yet the last episode of the television show of the anonymous & Co. (as he called him) until then had been on the whole acceptable, Saviano had not spoken of the Camorra, he had done, but quite another with dignity and and intellectual authority, Piero Grasso, a reading list that-he-with the excitement of reason, he considered perfect and they have to go to a moment of emotion. The same
Saviano had also candidly admitted that what counts at the end of the show is the story and its inherent ability to create and live in the stories of others. Talk to me, badly, but enough that I speak, in other words. All
all a balance acceptable.
Sure He remained deeply convinced that the ultimate goal of the story was the truth (because of his anger against Saviano), but, ultimately, the final admission of the "rival" gave him, however, a certain satisfaction.
The rest of the interventions were secularly appeared sober and civilly, without indulging, this time in the usual temptation of "secular" liberation "
So why ruin it with that sentence?
He did not doubt that Saviano had it in him!
He had understood since the first episode, and indeed it was understood since the exit of Gomorrah.
At that time he was still in the dungeon rooms of the palace near the crest of what would soon be revealed by the end of a precipice which, even today, hardly a trace. The politicians and notables "discovered" in those days "the mafia" or rather discovered the exceptional opportunity that the success of that book gave them to finally give the public the true cause of all social and civil disaster. Berlusconi was so good alibi but only from the political point of view, with the passage of time became more and more difficult to explain how every bad thing in the government of Naples was the fault of Berlusconi and most importantly, more importantly, it is difficult to invoke the demon Silvio to justify the unreliability of This assessor, or this or that municipal council or manager of that company and so on. The Camorra, suddenly became the favorite topic of denunciation in the wars of the building, coalition party, the bars ... and even parish!
He had always distanced himself from Gomorrah as he had always taken the distance by the wars of the building although there was involved for the work he did.
initially seemed almost funny receive confidences councilor revealed that, indeed, "confidentially," the racketeer councilor belonging to his rival in the vicinity of power to the mayor, and then receive the same confidence in the second assessor against the first.
less fun and above all ethical deep unease felt when these accusations were made by descending policy and administrative actions, such as not to do this work not to increase the power of the commissioner that as close to the Camorra or not to grant funds in the budget for political activity by such assessor to ensure that the funds alleged to seep into the hands of the Camorra. Thank
Gomorrah system of vetoes of city politics had purchased a powerful ideological justification, which combined to-define what is prudent to wait deliberately conducted a euphemism-the Mayor, produced a progressive paralysis of the city government.
Councillors and notables spent most of their time to demonstrate to the Mayor of the danger of their opponent in order to remove him from his due. Solomon listened to the Mayor and the fact that the fighters left neutralize each other.
between risk and do not do ... rather, Democrat, do not alter balances!
He tried to explain, with the ingenuity and passion of their youth, that the Camorra does not exist where the state is strong, spread like a cancer where the state is weak or is internally divided.
had led to evidence of this, his personal experience in the management of the national labor market, saying that he believed to be a trivial necessity: the zero tolerance of any deviant behavior than normal, was committed by anyone for any reason. He always told of events that had happened personally.
Like when one of the workers who ran a day he brought a message of a notorious racketeer held in prison (!) Which requested a transfer to its own "cousin" (who knows why in Naples are all brothers, cousins \u200b\u200bor cousins \u200b\u200bof someone!) He replied that it was not possible for organizational reasons and that if there had been a possibility in the future, the worker-like others-should not have to do is submit specific questions. Some time later a similar request reached by political means, through a local councilor.
E 'exactly the time when-he-he explained the Camorra observes the behavior of the state.
What to do? Say no to a policy meant to affect their role within the entity (the political vindictiveness as the Camorra just do not shoot! -... Perhaps not directly) Say yes to politics would open interesting political backing for the future, always useful, particularly if it plays a role in time and therefore it is structurally weak. But to say yes to politics would mean, at the same time, communicate to the Camorra that there were two laws: one for the common world (of which belonged to the Camorra) and a for politicians ... and has never said that a politician is worth more than a racketeer!
In over ten years was able to antagonize the whole constitutional system of three consiliature! It was the most hated by the political leadership but perhaps the most respected by the Camorra. Boasted, almost with pride, that the judgments had been reported of a notorious racketeer against which defines it as a state, one that is on the other side when he says that is not for everyone, that does not look in the face anyone ... principles of an honest but stupid (he liked to tell these stories in Neapolitan language ... much more effective in what often sounds, the cadence and gestures are more expressive power of his own words) why not stand
Saviano, guilty from his point of view of having hidden the truth of what he saw as the necessary and sufficient condition that allows the racket to live: the connivance of the civil society and politics . He used to say, a civil society and a political class can exist without the Camorra (just look, for example, the society of states in the Western world), the Camorra, in contrast, can not exist alone without that a civil society and a ruling class policy compliant and / or corrupt. He wants to eliminate the Camorra? Just delete the civil society and politicians colluded and / or conniving! He hated
Gomorrah which never explained how he really a racketeer to do business, activities and actions of any kind, that does not show all links with the so-called respectable people, who voluntarily or involuntarily ended up with their work, to allow the deployment of 'criminal action.
Reading Gomorrah-claimed him-it seemed that the "gangster" lived in a kind of "social vacuum" in a territory occupied only by the Camorra and unarmed people, a far west ... almost!.
could not stand the fact that concealing the truth about complex social and political mechanisms and especially on the centrality and necessity of these in the development of the crime, Gomorrah to provide a great excuse to end the collective mass of an acquittal in which everyone would find his own place, relegating, with hypocritical resignation, the drama of civil entire territories submitted to a force, in fact, as alien to the local social context that as such, was intended only to endure it.
But most of all could not stand that in this mass is discharged autocollocassero especially politicians, dignitaries and various intelligentsia against whose moral corruption and ethics, rather than economic, he fought, defeated, every day in Naples.
Oh No! Saviano's last words had not digested their own!
[more ...]
0 comments:
Post a Comment